What is the difference between ipa and grounded theory

Some favour a Husserlian approach, where the emphasis is on description; others favour a Heideggerian approach, where the emphasis is on analysis and attempting to explain what is happening in the phenomenon examined. Some find this methodological evolution fascinating but for many more it adds to the confusion.

Fortunately, few researchers need concern themselves with such matters and many good textbooks can aid methodological decision-making. Sticking to a single approach usually gives researchers the tools to undertake their research.

There are differences but this does not mean that one approach is right and one is wrong. Grounded theory and phenomenology are research tools and one will not be suited to all jobs. The list of further reading provides more detailed information on this subject. Parahoo K Qualitative research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Holloway I, Todres L Grounded theory. Todres L, Holloway I Phenomenological research. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Sign in or Register a new account to join the discussion. With IPA, there's a chance you can use them, depending on who and how you've interviewed.

Interesting that you began interviewing without having your method sorted though? Post by joanner » Sat Oct 10, pm Russ, long story! I thought I had sorted my methodology when I was with my first research supervisor but she left the course and I was given a new one who's looking at my project with new eyes and in great detail.

She picked my rationale apart, unlike my first supervisor, and I realised it wasn't as watertight as I thought bearing in mind I'd never done much research before. My new supervisor is concerned that when I get to the viva stage, it won't look good if I changed my method partway through.

She said that you interview with your method in mind, rather than applying the method to the interview. I'd have to have a very good argument for still using the four interviews I've done already. I guess my confidence has been knocked and I was thinking it might be better to start from scratch again so the viva panel can't tear me apart too much. I have interviewed the same participants as I would with GT and my supervisor says my interview schedule would be suitable for an IPA project.

From what I've read, the two methods are quite similar in many ways correct me if I'm wrong! I suppose as well, when I started interviewing, I came from a place where I assumed people would have understood their diagnosis and the preventative action they could take to minimise their chances of developing their condition.

However, what I've found is that people didn't necessarily understand their diagnosis and often don't know they can take preventative action they don't seem to remember being given this information. Therefore, my interviews have been steered more towards the meaning of the condition for them and how they describe their understanding of it, and their health in general. Based on this, I was wondering about saying these were useful pilot interivews which gave me focus for the real ones.

I would love to be able to use them and reduce my interviewing time but I don't want to cut corners when my entire doctorate hangs on it! Post by russ » Sat Oct 10, pm While you're right that in an ideal world, you should know your method before you interview and shouldn't change midway, the pragmatist in me wonders whether you can do the thing now as an IPA, and whether anyone else, like examiners, would need to know different?

Even if you did make it obvious, the point of the research is as a learning experience, and I know others who changed analytic strategy midway. What is phenomenology with example? Phenomenology is the philosophical study of observed unusual people or events as they appear without any further study or explanation.

An example of phenomenology is studying the green flash that sometimes happens just after sunset or just before sunrise. What is the opposite of phenomenology? What is phenomenology in simple terms? Phenomenology studies conscious experience as experienced from the subjective or first person point of view. What is the aim of phenomenology?

The purpose of a phenomenological approach in research is to clarify and enlighten how people understand and comprehend certain phenomena. Nowadays, phenomenology approach in research methods are used widely in the research study of any field, such as psychology and medical.

What are phenomenological methods? The phenomenological method aims to describe, understand and interpret the meanings of experiences of human life. It focuses on research questions such as what it is like to experience a particular situation.

In what kind of research can hermeneutic phenomenology be applied? Hermeneutic phenomenology is a research method used in qualitative research in the fields of education and other human sciences, for example nursing science. It is a widely used method example in Scandinavia, and Van Manen is well known for his hermeneutic phenomenological method.

Can I use store credit to buy a gift card? What is stimulus based model of stress?